Considering the fact ‘Crossfire’, this paper believed there is no alternative to ensuring justice and enacting moral duty of law enforcement agencies to indemnify security and safety of the citizen of Bangladesh.The US government's China Initiative sought to protect national security. This moral ideology concentrates on universal human rights and keeps the consequences aside. However, the article advocates for a distinctive idea of justice known as deontological philosophy proposed by Immanuel Kant. Both the utilitarian idea analyzed by Jeremy Bentham (consequences) and John Stuart Mill (individual human rights) echoes the voice of these two distinct groups respectively. This paper analyzed the justice idea of both groups who are for and against this event from a moral philosophical perspective in the context of Bangladesh. Though public notions about these incidents are surprisingly flexible and they consider this for a prognosis to remainder culprits. This occurrence is facing enormous criticisms in the home and abroad and considered as a violation of human rights. gunfight event between members of law enforcement agencies and criminal groups. ![]() Initially, it was a media term, but now widely used to express the murder of a criminal or accused in a. Contrariwise, a suspicious incident of a particular form of extrajudicial killing Crossfire is fading their achievements. In recent times, the law enforcement agencies of Bangladesh are universally appreciated for their constitutive and plucky attitude to extremist gangs inside the country. The Bamboo Ceiling is not an Asian issue, but an issue of cultural fit. These results suggest that East Asians hit the Bamboo Ceiling because their low assertiveness is incongruent with American norms concerning how leaders should communicate. However, East Asians were lower in assertiveness, which consistently mediated the leadership attainment gap between East Asians and South Asians. Analyses revealed that East Asians faced less prejudice than South Asians, and were equally motivated by work and leadership as South Asians. To understand why the Bamboo Ceiling exists for East Asians but not South Asians, we examined three categories of mechanisms-prejudice (inter-group), motivation (intra-personal), and assertiveness (inter-personal)-while controlling for demographics (e.g., birth country, English fluency, education, socioeconomic status). ![]() Across nine studies (N = 11,030) using mixed methods (archival analyses of chief executive officers, field surveys in large US companies, student leader nominations and elections, and experiments), East Asians were less likely than South Asians and Whites to attain leadership positions, whereas South Asians were more likely than Whites to do so. To investigate the mechanisms and scope of the problem, we compared the leadership attainment of the two largest Asian subgroups in the United States: East Asians (e.g., Chinese) and South Asians (e.g., Indians). However, they appear disproportionately under-represented in leadership positions, a problem known as the “Bamboo Ceiling.” It remains unclear why this problem exists and whether it applies to all Asians or only particular Asian subgroups. Well-educated and prosperous, Asians are called the “model minority” in the United States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |